2025 Enterprise SaaS & AI Predictions

AnalysisDec 19, 2024
2025-saas-predictions

By Eugene Lee and Julianna Vitolo

As we move into 2025, we wanted to share some of our predictions about where the market is headed next year – particularly as it pertains to our area of investment focus. Some of these are going to be fairly obvious, but just because there’s consensus around a topic doesn’t mean there’s no upside opportunity, even when it comes to venture-scale returns. 

Overall, 2024 was a year of major upheaval and significant structural changes in enterprise software, especially at the foundation layer. We think 2025 could be even more transformative – and we anticipate that the volume and character of activity in B2B software venture deals will reflect that.

Here’s a rundown of our top predictions for 2025, and some of the resulting implications: 

Macroeconomics & Policy Changes

  • Interest rates will continue to decline, albeit gradually, which will continue to prop up the venture fundraising environment and increase capital deployment rates. While pacing was conservative in 2024, we expect it to quicken and drive more competition between VCs for “hot” deals 

Agents

Agents will continue their starring role in the AI enthusiasm cycle, with most startups focused on automating tasks and actions for enterprises

  • OpenAI’s planned launch of Operator in Jan 2025 will further fuel this trend 

  • We will continue to see applications of agents customized and trained to complete a specific function or use case. We have seen this for customer support, for example.

  • We’ll likely continue to see an explosion of AI agents for very specific use cases, rather than general purpose agents (for now)

    • The end state will be horizontal (orchestrator) and vertical (including function-specific). Horizontals will come as soon as verticals prove their worth and accuracy

AI: Most Disruptive Impacts

  • Areas where AI will be most disruptive:

    • AI will begin to replace the Big 4 professional services firms – potentially by buying individual practices and replacing them with software. Any more rules-based divisions like tax, audit, or recruiting services will likely be the first to get disrupted, but eventually any consulting services could be impacted.

    • Compliance: Monitoring of adherence to rules, instant updates based on rule changes, auto-checks on outgoing and external comms/reporting becomes much more prevalent, and a default for tech-forward enterprises 

    • AI replaces middle management layer at some large-scale tech companies looking to get back to “founder mode”. As IC’s become supercharged with AI capabilities and productivity soars, we envision there will be less of a need for a layer between them and the upper level management. Companies will be incentivized to implement scrappy scaling tactics and to keep teams lean 

    • Code: Improvements will result in the ‘democratization of the 10x engineer,’ which will mean funding imbalances at early stages have less impact on startups’ ability to compete with one another

    • We will see the beginnings of a fully AI-native ERP by end of next year

AI: Slower Burn Transformations

  • AI is machine communication and learning — so it’s specifically designed for machine tasks 

    • During the first Industrial Revolution, we learned to operate machines and they were designed for the optimal interaction of humans and machines 

    • During the current Machine Intelligence Revolution, we’re removing ourselves from the equation — machines will be designed for optimal interaction with other machines (i.e. the multi-agent systems of the future will likely have different UI than the human-machine interfaces of present) 

  • Companies will need to figure out their proprietary data moat if they're building at the application layer. Everyone will integrate with everyone else, and throw some automated agent or workflow on top, but what’s unique to you and what you’re building going forward will be in the new data being captured or created

  • The definition of core vs. non-core will change: with embedded products, more businesses will use internal capabilities to build AI-specific internal tools either for their own use or into their products. As a result, tools designed for non-AI engineers will see tremendous growth 

  • We will see increased trust & safety demand as AI proliferates since it’s the main blocker to enterprise adoption

  • Pricing models in the near-term will be volume and outcome-based. We have already begun to see this practice take off within the customer support agent use case. Our expectation is that it will proliferate across other use cases in the next year as companies toy with pricing to encourage greater AI adoption

  • Build vs. buy

    • Most large enterprises will be grappling with whether they should build new AI technology in-house or buy from third parties. We believe the main thinking around this will be to only build what you can’t currently buy, as long as you have the engineering talent to support it. 

    • If you have the technical prowess to build it, it will become a core competency for the business, and it won’t take too much time and energy away from the business’ own objectives then building it might make sense. 

    • An important caveat is that if it’s possible to buy it, then building it is likely not technically challenging enough and won’t create a deep enough competitive advantage

    • Combining a build/buy approach will create the most unique advantage

Financial Markets (M&A and IPO)

  • M&A Markets

    • Corporate development teams finally figure what they want to buy, primarily driven by a top down AI strategy or acqui-hires to pick up AI and ML talent to build internally

  • IPO Markets  

    • Based on the positive reception of the ServiceTitan public offering, IPO hopefuls like Stripe, Chime, Klarna, Coreweave, StubHub, and Cerebras may get the green light 

    • We expect to see the number of software IPOs hit double digits in 2025

    • The one catch will be in post-IPO performance – public markets will be less tolerant of cash burning public stocks and will expect a tighter timeline to hit profitability – likely two-to-four quarters rather than the previous four-to-six

    • So far, ServiceTitan has performed quite well, jumping over 50% in the first week of trading after its official public debut at $71 per share. This bodes well for the rest of the market and gives us greater confidence we’ll see some movement in the IPO backlog in 2025

As we approach 2025, these emerging patterns represent just a snapshot of what we're monitoring. What developments do you anticipate shaping the coming year? Reach out and let us know!